Compare materials
How foam glass aggregate compares
Sourced comparisons with EPS geofoam, pumice, lightweight cellular concrete and granular fill, including where each alternative is the better choice.
Comparison
Foam glass aggregate vs EPS geofoam
EPS geofoam is the lighter fill; foam glass aggregate is granular and not flammable, and the two differ on fuel resistance, placement in tight spaces and insulation.
Comparison
Foam glass aggregate vs pumice
Pumice is a natural volcanic fill at least twice as heavy as foam glass aggregate by published agency ranges, which matters most where the fill must unload soft ground.
Comparison
Foam glass aggregate vs lightweight cellular concrete
Cellular concrete cost less than foam glass aggregate hauled 800 miles in Illinois Tollway research; foam glass aggregate had lower environmental impact, uses ordinary equipment and drains freely.
Comparison
Foam glass aggregate vs conventional granular fill
Granular fill is stiffer and heavier; foam glass aggregate weighs 160 to 400 kg/m³ against 1,520 to 2,400 kg/m³, so it cuts settlement over soft ground and pressure behind walls.
Get a price and a delivery window.
Tell us the application, the volume and where it is going. A real person replies with pricing and a delivery window.